What Boneheaded Mistake Will Longmire Make This Week?

UPDATE: If you don't know, #Netflix has picked up Longmire, for 10 episodes for 2015!


We're all lovers of A&E's "Longmire" series, based on Craig Johnson's novels.  But: what the heck is up with the show's writers?

If you're a fan of A&E's Longmire, then you probably already know what I'm about to say, but why on earth are Longmire's writers so poorly-informed about the world in which we live?  Is it that they are cavalier about the intelligence of their audience? Do they simply not care?  Or are they themselves simply too lazy to do five minutes worth of research?  Here's a shortlist of some of the most boneheaded errors so far (and in this, I am repeatedly and deliberately ignoring the fact that they constantly get the law wrong with regard to lawkeeping on the reservations, adjoining towns/cities, and law enforcement officers, generally):

  1. In Episode 2 , Season 3, "Of Children and Travelers," which aired June 9th, Walt and Vic drive to Arizona from Wyoming.  There's no indication that they stop on the way, or spend a night before getting to Arizona.  They seem to drive to Arizona in a few hours, meet the woman at the orphanage, drive around some more, go to a hotel, and eat dinner.  Vic and Walt then retire to their (respective) hotel rooms.  When Vic speaks to one of the other deputies back in Wyoming on the phone,she says that she and Walt are "driving back in the morning, and we're going to see the foster parents."  The foster parents in Wyoming?   That morning?  Listen, Longmire writers, I have news for you:  I have a house in central Arizona and one in Western Wyoming (far closer to Arizona than eastern Wyoming, mind you).  They are 859 miles apart.  The fastest we have ever driven it--and this is on Western highways, where 70-80 mph (and, when nobody's around, even faster) is common--is 15 hours.  Hell, to drive from the northern edge of Phoenix, Arizona, to the Grand Canyon (still in Arizona, mind you) is not a minute less than 3 hours.  To Page, to the Utah border?  Add another hour and 15 minutes.  This is THE WEST, folks.  This isn't the Eastern Seaboard where you roll through 4 states in as many hours.  
  2. In season 1, "The Dog Soldier":  The writers completely get the adoption/fostering scam wrong.  Just ask attorney Bonnie Riley, who blogged about it on May 6th.  Bonnie said "On the A&E show, a villainous social worker and a group home director schemed to take children from the nearby Indian reservation, fabricating allegations of parental abuse or neglect, then skimming the premium paid to the foster parents. This made for a tension-filled story, but the show’s writers were apparently ignorant of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) in exercising their poetic license."  Now, in fairness, as this is a complicated issue, I'm prepared to cut the show's writers some slack, but this type of mistake continues, after nearly 3 seasons, to plague the show.
  3. Season 2, Episode 1:  In "Unquiet Mind," Walt tracks an escaped convict through a blizzard.  Now, as anyone who has ever lived in Wyoming, or Montana, etc., can tell you, taking off to track anyone in a blizard is, to put it mildly, incredibly stupid.  Moreover, Walt does this a) without proper clothing, barely wearing a jacket, much less snow gear, and b) manages to have a raging fight with the escapee, during which, Walt falls into a frozen stream, drenching himself--and survives.  Having lived both in Western Wyoming and Alaska, lemme tell you: that's total bullpucky.  Nobody survives being soaked in a Wyoming winter, hero or not.  This mistake was so bad that I wondered if author Craig Johnson actually lived in Key West, FL, but devotees of the series (written) tell me that this boneheaded mistake was yet another creation by Hollywood.  
  4. "Miss Cheyenne," which aired last week on the 16th, had this doozy:  Walt and Vic ask a doctor to "waive doctor-patient privilege" for his patient's privacy.  Hello? No such thing.  A doctor can violate his patient's privacy, and the patient's privilege--but he can't "waive" it.  The USA is a country of laws.  When you have laws, you have what are, for all intents and purposes, contracts.  Just as I can't sign a contract (for example, a car purchase and loan) for you, and bind you to that contract, a doctor can't waive his patient's privilege.  That belongs solely to the patient to waive--not the Doctor.  (Another Longmire boo-boo; last season , a doctor claimed "patient privilege" for a dead person--for whom privilege no longer exists.)  If the doctor gave Walt the information, he didn't waive the privilege--he violated it.  In the real world, doctors lose their licenses for that, and are oftentimes sued for the same thing.  I'm pretty sure that every 6th-Grader in the US, who has ever seen a television show, knows that the writers on Longmire got this one wrong.  

I don't mind a little "poetic license" in a storyline.  I don't.  But I do object to the constant errors that are so egregious that they yank me out of the story.  I really like Longmire.  The characters are great, and they are near-perfectly cast.  The storylines, generally, are pretty good.  So, why, then, is each episode ruined with some line of dialogue, or plot, that could be fixed with five minutes' worth of research?  It's a shame, and it consistently prevents Longmire from becoming a great show.

So, Longmire fans:  what will this week's boneheaded mistake be?  I'm assuming that as we see Henry in an electronic monitoring device, the mistake will be about that.  Either the tracking ankle bracelet will magically stop working, or will work too well--something.  I can't speak for other Longmire fans, but I for one would really like to see the show live up to its potential:  stop wasting all that on-screen talent by giving them crappy erroneous lines to read, or plotlines that are fatally flawed.  

 

Latest Blogs

11 July 2020

KDP, Print on Demand and Printing books in Color

"But, but...what do you mean, that it ...

02 July 2020

Fourth July Closing Announcement 2020

Holiday Closing Alert! Independence Day (July 4t...

02 July 2020

Phone Call Ban Notice

Phone Call Alert! (Please read, thanks.) ...

20 December 2018

2018-19 Winter Downtime Closing Announcement

2019-20 Winter Downtime Admin Office Hours: Merry...

20 December 2018

Holiday Closing Announcement 2019

Remember our Fallen Memorial Day, originally call...

12 October 2018

The Dangers of Self-Publishing with Zero Research

One of the topics that drives me a bit nuts is the...

Phone Call Alert! 

(Please read, thanks.) 

Old Timey Switchboard Operator Cartoon

 

Due to the COVID-19 onslaught, we currently cannot take incoming phone calls.  

 

A notification about phone calls:  due to the COVID-19 plague, we've significantly increased our incoming inquiries--nearly double our usual volume--and the number of incoming inquiries by phone has been literally overwhelming.  Although most writers will say that their call "will only take 15 minutes," the truth is, that after 10 years of doing this, most author inquiry calls take an hour.  45 minutes at best. I'm currently receiving 7-10 calls/day, and due to that, I've had to stop accepting incoming phone calls, which my voicemail will tell you. You can leave a message--I can't call you back without one--and if a call is needed, I will of course call you.  But we have very complete and extensive email replies, handouts and our website is very informative. Almost all the questions that I receive during a call are actually already answered on our site, or are, in fact, publishing questions, not questions about our services, what we do, what we offer, or the like.  I already handle between 90-130 emails/day, as it is. I can't handle that many emails and take 7-10 hours of calls each day. I can't. So, in order to be able to answer this huge email volume, to help the greatest number of people, with my time, I've had to stop accepting calls.  I'm sorry, but that's just how it is. I'm in the process of setting up a call-appointment function, for free 15-minute calls to answer questions from new prospective customers and longer paid sessions for folks who generally want consulting on "publishing," generally (and for prospective kids' book publishers, as a special category of paid consulting).  But that functionality isn't yet set up. I hope to get that working the 3rd week of July, sometime.  

Thank you for your understanding.